Regulation

US Senate proposal would prevent re-evaluation of USPS mail plants

Monday, September 19th, 2011

The assistant majority leader of the US Senate has added a clause in a finance appropriations bill to protect a mail processing plant in his own district in Illinois.

Perhaps indicative of the political challenge facing the US Postal Service as it seeks to “right size” its processing infrastructure, Senator Dick Durbin said the legislative addition would help protect jobs at the Processing and Distribution Annex in Quincy, Illinois.

More than just a parochial move, however, the new clause could prevent future re-evaluation of the entire USPS processing network.

Durbin, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Finance and Government Services, was responding to the USPS list, revealed on Thursday, of 252 mail plants across the country it is considering closing.

The Senator, who is now hoping to meet with Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe to talk about the Quincy plant, appeared to be angry that he learned of the review of the Quincy plant from the media.

He said of the USPS announcement: “It is neither fair nor prudent to announce major changes without proper study and consultation.”

The Quincy plant was considered for closure in 2009, when it was cleared to continue operations. Durbin’s new addition to his finance bill could prevent USPS from considering a mail plant for closure if it had been previously reviewed and cleared – even if circumstances had changed in the intervening time.

If successful, the legal change would challenge the new USPS policy of continuously reviewing its processing network to ensure it is running at an optimal level, as laid out by USPS vice president of network operations Dave Williams earlier this summer.

Writing to Donahoe, Durbin said the wording of his clause was: “The Committee directs the Postal Service to suspend any consolidations, closings, or job reductions at area mail processing facilities that have not had the benefit of a full AMP study and those where previous Postal Service analyses have found no significant cost savings or efficiencies would be gained by such action.”

Source: James Cartledge, Post&Parcel

Tags: , , ,



One Response to “US Senate proposal would prevent re-evaluation of USPS mail plants”

  • Troy Wagner says:

    You’ve got to be kidding me. When will the government allow us to run the USPS as a business? Yes, there will be SOME jobs lost with a consolidation of processing plants. I believe that is a much better senario than having the everyone with the USPS out of work. These are tough times that require tough decisions to be made. Just saying…..

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

P&P News Sign-up (Help)

 Daily newsletter  Weekly newsletter

Jobs RSS Job of the week

Pre-Sales Consultant

East Midlands, United-Kingdom
Salary: 45,000 - 55,000 GBP per annum

Advertise with us

Advertise with us
We provide brands with an exciting range of advertising opportunities to reach the influential Post & Parcel audience. With campaigns suitable for every budget you can achieve your marketing objectives with Post & Parcel.

Find out more

New Directory Members

JCtrans.net

JCtrans is the most famous domestic logistics integrated portal in China. Relying on electronic commerce and web-based platforms, JCtrans takes advantage of e-market, accounts settlements on line, logistics and finance on line, and credit systems, which are a series of diversified online services to integrate resources for logistics and trade areas domestically and overseas.

About Post & Parcel

Post & Parcel is your key to the global mail and express industry. Every week Post & Parcel features the latest news, analysis of trends, insightful viewpoints, top jobs and exclusive interviews with leading industry experts.


Find out more