Shippers wait to see whether other carriers will follow Maersk’s lead in restructuring inland network
Carriers determined to raise rates above and beyond higher rail costs
Maersk Line’s decision to streamline its inland network is causing heartburn for shippers such as Dave Panjwani, but the restructuring reflects the enormous cost of intermodal service to Maersk and other carriers.
Gordon Dorsey, a spokesman for Maersk, said the inland portion of shipping a container from Hong Kong to destinations in the U.S. interior accounts for about two-thirds of the total cost.
According to Dorsey, only a small percentage of the carrier’s customers will be affected by its action, but one of them is Panjwani, manager of international logistics for Deere & Co.
Maersk spokeswoman Jessica Kubacz declined to say where it is terminating inland service.
Besides revamping its inland network and consolidating some of its worldwide liner services, including trans-Pacific and trans-Atlantic routes, Maersk is seeking hefty rate increases this year, as are most other carriers. While that will be the main subject of contract negotiations between shippers and carriers over the next two months, Maersk is getting an early jump.
In the coming months, other Midwest shippers and NVOs will face choices similar to those encountering Panjwani and Huang. An informal survey of shippers, carrier executives and forwarders conducted in mid-February found that no other container lines had yet decided to revamp their inland networks as Maersk is doing, but it’s clear that carriers are determined to pass along the higher intermodal rates demanded by the railroads.
The main cost driver for all carriers this year is the cost of rail and truck intermodal service, said Lamont Petersen, vice president of marketing for Hyundai Merchant Marine.
According to Petersen, the rates charged by the container lines were not remunerative even before the railroads hiked their prices.
