Tag: UK

The CWU ballot on Royal Mail pensions rolls on. I have more than a hunch that the CWU made a major blunder during the last pay deal talks and over the next few weeks, it will become abundantly clear that that is exactly what has happened.

Royal Mail gave the assurance to CWU leader Bill Hayes that workers opinions would be taken into account and the CWU would be consulted. Hayes interpretaion of that was that nothing would be pushed through without his and Dave Ward’s say so and the pair of them went off smiling, thinking everything was fine and they had set the pension apart from the pay deal. The pay deal was ratified with that impression.

The fact is, Royal Mail HAS consulted workers – it invited everyone to put forward their views and it has talked to the CWU. I’ll admit its not what the CWU thought would happen, but when this is presented to the Trustees, Royal Mail will in fact have met the meaning of the consultation process in full and it will probably be accepted on that basis. This is precisely what Hayes said in a recent circular to reps. It is peppered with bullet points and makes it plain that the CWU isn’t exactly happy abut the pension revision, but if you go through it, CWU HQ don’t appear to have any weight to object to this – other than a threat of upping their campaign – whatever that means.

Royal Mail will have consulted with some of the sharpest solicitors around and it is unlikely that the CWU will have matched that level of expertise. Whether it was down to limited finances or poor legal advisors on the CWU’s part is unimportant, but RM have never at any point said that they would let the CWU decide on how the pension issue shoud be solved – not in any official statement or even in the wording of the finalised pay deal.

We already have at least one example where last year, the CWU had to cover their tracks when the notice given of one bout of inustrial action did not comply with the law and Royal Mail were not only quick to pick up on it, they filed an injunction. The legal advisors that Royal Mail use are very hot on wording and small print and in my view, the CWU was in way out of its depth last year. We had a long phase of both sides refusing to budge until one particular meeting – after which the CWU suddenly changed its tune. You go figure that one, but chances are, Royal Mail laid out the figures that showed the whole picture in terms that Hayes and Ward could understand and they then realised that the strikes were not going to get them anywhere. The deal was closed fairly quickly after that.

Theres also the problem of lost business every time there is a strike. If workers decide to engage in one-day stoppages or head for picket lines, Royal Mail will lose more contracts through downstream access – not to mention the support of customers.

The CWU will continue to make lots of noise, as indeed it has to, but the most workers can expect is a small sweetener after private meetings between the CWU and RM bosses. Despite the talk of strikes, few workers see any merit in another and even if they did, it won’t change the need to restructure a pension scheme in massive debt. Royal Mail’s pension scheme isn’t the only one struggling and many have collapsed – few if any of those people will see their money again. Like the last deal, Hayes will do his best to find some small nugget to present to CWU members as evidence of victory but thats about all.

The hard-liners are tough enough to march enmasses with Burslem blowing in their hair, but Royal Mail isn’t the only operator out there now any more. It may be the biggest final mile service but it is already delivering mail for other companes at less profit – it really doesn’t take a genius to see that the trend will continue and at an even faster pace if workers opt to stand outside delivery offices doing nothing.

Things might have been very different if Royal Mail was the only mail handler operating in the UK but with new postal