Assisted Selling and Point-of-decision Marketing
Assisted Selling and Point-of-decision Marketing
Read MoreAssisted Selling and Point-of-decision Marketing
Read MoreThe Benefits of Retail Kiosks
Read MoreUPS and FedEx have expanded their air freight services, predominantly in Asia. Rival DHL, meanwhile, is facing calls for a retreat from the US.
FedEx is out to get a larger share of the intra-Asian air freight market. On January 10, the integrator launched an economy door-to-door service for shipments between 10 markets in the region as well as for exports from these areas to North America and Europe.
The new “International Economy” offering is a day-definite product with transit times that are typically one or two days longer than the FedEx’s premium service. On intra-Asian legs, this means usually two business days, whereas shipments to the US or major European centres take three to four business days on average.
At this point, the service is available in Australia, mainland China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. In March, FedEx plans to extend it to Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Small to medium-sized companies are the main target group of the new offering. According to the integrator, the product addresses the needs of customers in Asia who look primarily for reliability and cost efficiency.
Individual packages must weigh 68 kilos or less, but there are no weight restrictions on multi-piece shipments. The service includes Customs clearance and a money-back guarantee.
UPS has overhauled its international air freight portfolio, with the emphasis on markets outside its US home turf. The new line-up, which features three products, is a move to integrate the company’s air freight services into a single portfolio along the lines of its express parcel set-up.
Rival DHL is facing a bigger challenge to get its house in order, according to major Wall Street firms. Over the past couple of months, Bear Stearns and Morgan Stanley both released studies that characterised the express outfit’s foray into the US market as a loss-making disaster with no black figures in sight.
Read MorePosted by Archive | Jan 28, 2008 | E-Commerce |
More than 85 percent of the world’s online population has used the Internet to make a purchase — increasing the market for online shopping by 40 percent in the past two years — according to the latest Nielsen Global Online Survey on Internet shopping habits. Globally, more than half of Internet users have made at least one purchase online in the past month, according to Nielsen.
Among Internet users, the highest percentage shopping online is found in South Korea, where 99 percent of those with Internet access have used it to shop, followed by the UK (97pct), Germany (97pct), Japan (97pct) with the U.S. eighth, at 94 percent. Additionally, in South Korea, 79 percent of these Internet users have shopped in the past month, followed by the UK (76pct) and Switzerland (67pct) with the U.S. at 57 percent.
Globally, the most popular and purchased items over the Internet are Books (41pct purchased in the past three months), Clothing/Accessories/Shoes (36pct), Videos / DVDs / Games (24pct), Airline Tickets (24pct) and Electronic Equipment (23pct).
Credit cards are by far the most common method of payment for online purchases — 60 percent of global online consumers used their credit card for a recent online purchase, while one in four online consumers chose PayPal. Of those paying with a credit card, more than half (53pct) used Visa.
According to Nielsen, online shoppers tend to stick to the shopping sites they are familiar with, with 60 percent saying they buy mostly from the same site. “This shows the importance of capturing the tens of millions of new online shoppers as they make their first purchases on the Internet. If shopping sites can capture them early, and create a positive shopping experience, they will likely capture their loyalty and their money,” said Paul.
Arkansas Best Corporation (ABFS-$27.45-Peer Perform)
Signs of Hope Drive Stock
IN-LINE REPORT. ABFS reported 4Q EPS generally in-line with expectations (4% below Cons. but well above our low end expectation and with some puts & takes) Rev, EBIT and EPS changed y-o-y by +2%, -5% and -4%, a big acceleration on much easier comps from -5%,-40% and -45% in 3Q. We roughly estimate that ABFS benefited by $0.09 y-o-y from higher fuel rev. net of costs.
TONNAGE LESS WORSE THAN EXPECTED. ABFS reported daily tonnage declines less worse (-1.5%) than exp. in 4Q into easier comps and improved traction with its RPM rollout. Importantly Mgmt noted Dec and Jan tonnage were modestly + y-o-y. Mgmt will not break out how much of this tonnage improvement is related to the increasing traction in the roll out of their next day product, but we suspect most, if not all of it.
REPORTED YIELDS ALSO BETTER THAN EXPECTED. ABFS reported yields up 2.5% y-o-y compared to -0.2% in 3Q. Our rough estimate is that about 3.5pp-4pp of this is related to fuel surcharges which are up 42% over a yr ago and that actual pricing remains down. This would explain the in-line report despite better than exp. reported tonnage, yields, gains on sales & tax rate.
SO, WHY WAS THE STOCK UP 17%? We suspect a combination of short covering into the report, 2 of our competitors defensive upgrades in the morning, as well as the recent rush to own early cyclicals into the news that tonnage had likely bottomed into easier comps. Also we suspect some investors may misinterpret reported yields and arguably temporary benefits from the fuel surcharge, with real pricing improvement.
WHAT TO DO WITH THE STOCK? The truck stocks are en fuego into the Fed’s recent more aggressive stance and signs that 4Q reports were not a total disaster. We noted when we upgraded the sector two weeks ago that we expected the stocks to be very volatile and present many trading opportunities up and down during 2008. Our sense is the group, including ABFS has likely gotten ahead of itself in the near term.
INVESTMENT CONCLUSION: ABFS was up 17% on Friday (compared to -1.6% for the S&P 500 and 2.6% for our LTL Index ex-ABFS) after reporting an in-line 4Q, but noting that tonnage trends had improved in December and January.
We have raised our estimates for C08 and C09 from $2.20 and $2.20 to $2.32 and $2.42 (compared to prior Cons of $2.33 and $2.59), respectively. ABFS is currently trading at 11.8x and 3.3x our upwardly revised forward year rolling EPS and EV/EBITDA estimates, respectively, although our sense is that ABFS will need continued high fuel surcharges relative to a year ago to make these numbers. This compares to its 1, 3 and 5 year averages of 11.9x, 11.2x, and 11.6x and 3.9x, 4.0x and 4.2x, respectively. We note if we add in an estimated $825M in pension liability that it would cost ABFS to exit its multi-employer to its current EV and add about $17M back to EBITDA as a rough estimate of potential savings from a single employer plan, ABFS’ EV/EBITDA would be a much higher than historical 7.7x. We retain our Peer Perform rating on ABFS.
What does ABFS’ report mean for other LTL providers? We were not sure as we have noted previously in preview notes, whether the LTL providers would continue to make money on fuel surcharges net of higher fuel costs in a rising fuel environment, given a recent more competitive rate environment and some customers capping fuel surcharges. Our sense is that ABFS’ report is likely evidence that they did benefit in a rising y-o-y fuel scenario and others should also. We suspect ABFS reported in-line despite better than expected tonnage and yields because pricing is very weak but fuel surcharges helped stem some of that negative drag. Below we estimate that ABFS benefited about $0.09/share in 4Q from higher fuel surcharge net of higher fuel costs. We would expect the other LTL providers to also benefit in 4Q and assuming current diese
Read More
Post & Parcel Magazine is our print publication, released 3 times a year. Packed with original content and thought-provoking features, Post & Parcel Magazine is a must-read for those who want the inside track on the industry.