Mail competition is 'no benefit' (UK)

The liberalisation of the UK postal service has produced “no significant benefits” for either households or small businesses, a report has said.

That is the initial finding of an independent review of the UK postal sector commissioned by the government.

It warned there was now a threat to the Royal Mail’s financial stability.

The independent panel warned that the “substantial threat” to the Royal Mail’s financial security threatened the universal service – the collection and delivery to all UK addresses.

Maintaining the universal service is at the heart of this review – ensuring collection from pillar boxes and post offices and delivery to all addresses

As a result, the independent panel – which will produce its full report in the summer – said the continuing “status quo is not tenable”.

While the initial report said homes and small firms had not gained from the increased competition, it said large companies had “seen clear benefits from liberalisation – choice, lower prices and more assurance about the quality of the mail service”.

It says these large firms have benefited from the big growth in competition in the bulk mail sector – postal firms that collect, sort and transport bulk mail before handing it over to the Royal Mail for the final delivery.

Yet at the same time, the report found that the Royal Mail still had “virtually no competition” in the delivery of addressed letters over the “final mile” to letterboxes.

The core problem for the Royal Mail is that while it has lost business in the lucrative bulk mail collection and sorting market, it still has to uphold the universal mail delivery service, which struggles to make a profit.

The Royal Mail and regulator Postcomm have both declined to comment on the initial report.

The liberalisation of the UK postal service has produced “no significant benefits” for either households or small businesses, a report has said.

That is the initial finding of an independent review of the UK postal sector commissioned by the government.

It warned there was now a threat to the Royal Mail’s financial stability.

The independent panel warned that the “substantial threat” to the Royal Mail’s financial security threatened the universal service – the collection and delivery to all UK addresses.

Maintaining the universal service is at the heart of this review – ensuring collection from pillar boxes and post offices and delivery to all addresses

As a result, the independent panel – which will produce its full report in the summer – said the continuing “status quo is not tenable”.

While the initial report said homes and small firms had not gained from the increased competition, it said large companies had “seen clear benefits from liberalisation – choice, lower prices and more assurance about the quality of the mail service”.

It says these large firms have benefited from the big growth in competition in the bulk mail sector – postal firms that collect, sort and transport bulk mail before handing it over to the Royal Mail for the final delivery.

Yet at the same time, the report found that the Royal Mail still had “virtually no competition” in the delivery of addressed letters over the “final mile” to letterboxes.

“Maintaining the universal service is at the heart of this review – ensuring collection from pillar boxes and post offices and delivery to all addresses,” said the report.

The core problem for the Royal Mail is that while it has lost business in the lucrative bulk mail collection and sorting market, it still has to uphold the universal mail delivery service, which struggles to make a profit.

Looking towards the final report, the panel said it needed “to establish how best to create the incentives for Royal Mail to modernise its operation, providing a stable financial future”.

Mail industry analyst David Stubbs said that one possible solution would be other firms taking over delivery work in the more remote parts of the UK, and being paid a subsidy to do so.

The Royal Mail and regulator Postcomm have both declined to comment on the initial report.

Consumer group Postwatch said it was pleased that the review was taking place, and that the panel recognised that “a healthy, efficient and profitable Royal Mail is critically important”.

Last year Royal Mail announced a programme of changes to pay and working practices which it said were essential to modernise the service and enable it to compete more effectively.

However, this led to a strike by Royal Mail staff and a bitter dispute which, although now resolved, is estimated to have cost Royal Mail more than GBP 200m.

The independent review panel was appointed by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

Relevant Directory Listings

Listing image

KEBA

KEBA is an internationally successful high-tech company with headquarters in Linz (Austria) and subsidiaries worldwide. KEBA is active in the three operative business areas: Industrial Automation, Handover Automation and Energy Automation. The company has been developing and producing for more than 50 years according to […]

Find out more

Other Directory Listings

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

P&P Poll

Loading

What’s the future of the postal USO?

Thank you for voting
You have already voted on this poll!
Please select an option!



MER Magazine


The Mail & Express Review (MER) Magazine is our quarterly print publication. Packed with original content and thought-provoking features, MER is a must-read for those who want the inside track on the industry.

 

News Archive

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This