Royal Mail calls for end to price controls after profits collapse (UK)
An interim report from the Government-commissioned review of the deregulation of mail services in 2006 warned this week that only large businesses were benefiting from competition and that the statutory requirement on Royal Mail to offer daily deliveries to every address in the UK would cause it substantial financial problems.
Despite Mr Crozier’s warning, Postcomm, the industry regulator, pointed out that Royal Mail had already been allowed to raise the cost of stamps ahead of inflation and said it believed the current level of price controls governing the company was appropriate.
However, Royal Mail is currently most taxed about the regulation of its services to larger businesses, where it now faces significant competition from around 20 rival suppliers. While the company is free to set prices for services in this area as it sees fit, it has to offer the same price to all businesses on each of its tariffs. It is also required to offer rival services access to its delivery network, at a cost fixed in relation to the charges it makes its own customers.
Mr Crozier believes these restrictions reduce the competitiveness of the business services offered through Royal Mail Letters, undermining the company’s ability to subsidise the universal service.
The Government’s review of deregulation is due to conclude later this year but has already said the status quo should not be allowed to continue.
Nevertheless, relaxation of regulation of Royal Mail is likely to be stiffly contested by both Postcomm and the company’s commercial rivals, such as UK Post and TNT, which are facing similar market pressures. The overall size of the mail market in the UK is declining as the internet replaces both personal and business mail. More people pay bills online or by direct debit, and businesses have moved away from direct mailshot activities towards online marketing.
While Royal Mail’s rivals now collect and sort a fifth of all mail in the UK – before paying Royal Mail to deliver much of it – they insist they still need protection from the former monopoly.
Read More
