Letter to FT from Stuart Bell MP

Sir, By creating independent regulatory bodies, the government nevertheless finds it cannot walk away from its responsibilities towards the national economy. Postcomm may be independent but the government would not escape electoral responsibility for an over-hasty opening of the postal markets (“Postcomm’s independence in ‘extremely good health'”, May 30).

“What about the workers?” may be a cry from a bygone age, but the difficulties encountered by Consignia – losses of Pounds 1.5m a day with a spin-off in threatened redundancies – meant that it was wise for Patricia Hewitt, the trade and industry secretary, to let Postcomm know of her anxieties about an over-hasty rush to the free market. The lesson is that the so-called independence of regulators will never be a substitute for democratic accountability.

Relevant Directory Listings

Listing image

PasarEx

PasarEx is a Colombian company that provides international express transportation services for air cargo, packages and documents, and last mile services for electronic commerce platforms. PasarEx is positioned in the logistics market in Colombia due to its rapid response and personalized attention and the use […]

Find out more

Other Directory Listings

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

P&P Poll

Loading

What's the future of the postal USO?

Thank you for voting
You have already voted on this poll!
Please select an option!



Post & Parcel Magazine


Post & Parcel Magazine is our print publication, released 3 times a year. Packed with original content and thought-provoking features, Post & Parcel Magazine is a must-read for those who want the inside track on the industry.

 

News Archive

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This